ELISE MORNEAU

ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY

C: 713.504.5142

CAREER OVERVIEW

Elise Morneau is an associate at Blueprint Construction Counsel, LLP, where her practice

focuses on resolving complex commercial and industrial construction disputes through litigation

and arbitration. She has significant experience addressing issues involving construction defects,

design flaws, delay claims, product liability, breach of contract, payment controversies, differing

site conditions, mechanic’s and materialman’s liens, insurance coverage, and indemnity

obligations.

Drawing on her broad litigation background, Elise offers practical strategies aimed at minimizing

project disruption and achieving cost-effective resolutions for her clients. By blending

substantive construction law experience with a pragmatic, results-oriented approach, Elise

provides comprehensive counsel designed to help clients navigate complex disputes and

successfully move their projects forward.

EDUCATION

South Texas College of Law, J.D., 2015

Austin College, B.A., Political Science, 2012

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES

State Bar of Texas, 2015

United States District Court of the Southern District of Texas

United States District Court of the Western District of Texas

MEMBERSHIPS & ADMISSIONS

Texas Bar Association: Construction Law Section

Houston Bar Association: Construction Law Section

REPRESENTATIVE EXPEREIENCE

Obtained favorable defense award after three-week arbitration hearing on behalf of ENR

Top 10 general contractor client against claims of over $37,000,000 brought by

subcontractor and four pass-through sub-subcontractors.  Case involved one of the largest

commercial projects ever built in the City of Houston, and the largest healthcare tower

project built to date in the Texas Medical Center, with construction costs that exceeded

$500,000,000.  After 28 witnesses and nearly 4,000 trial exhibits and demonstratives,

claimants recovered nothing on loss of productivity and delay claims associated with

alleged mismanagement, abuse, and intentional interference, and were denied request for

over $6,800,000 in attorney’s fees and costs.